@dorukesin: Ok, you're literally the only one that thinks Reeve's even has a chance, let alone wins. Shouldn't that tell you something? Multiple users trying to explain to you how and why he looses?
@god_spawn@deranged_midget_ One of you guys want to take a look at this and hopefully lock the s**t out of it. OP has admitted to making a battle he thought was spite and pretty much the entire CV community agrees on the outcome. This is also his 3rd - 5th thread like this.
@dorukesin: Ok, you're literally the only one that thinks Reeve's even has a chance, let alone wins. Shouldn't that tell you something? Multiple users trying to explain to you how and why he looses?
@god_spawn@deranged_midget_ One of you guys want to take a look at this and hopefully lock the s**t out of it. OP has admitted to making a battle he thought was spite and pretty much the entire CV community agrees on the outcome. This is also his 3rd - 5th thread like this.
yes you are right im going to solo on a multiple "wally" fanboys and they can't give an answer
im sure about a lot of guys could take supes in a DC/Marvel multiverse but wally is not one of them
He reverses time around the whole earth without even landing, bringing Lois back to life, and then he goes and kills Wally before he ever gets it into his fool head to mess with her.
Did you know Superman was just trying to re-perform the exact same feat in Justice League of America # 08
He reverses time around the whole earth without even landing, bringing Lois back to life, and then he goes and kills Wally before he ever gets it into his fool head to mess with her.
Did you know Superman was just trying to re-perform the exact same feat in Justice League of America # 08
Its a part of Forever Evil, and Superman is actually trapped in some sort of weird prision, so even if he does in fact fly FTL like he wants to , it doesnt change anything.
But what Superman, not knowing anything here, was trying to do in the issue was trying to fly circles around Earth, at faster than light speed to turn back time, just like he did in the movie.
Movies are nerfed compared to their source material (comic)... and since cinematic universe is not cannon to the comic universe MEANS feats are not transferable!! ergo... comic Wally demolishes movie Clark. That is the ONLY logical outcome.
Movies are nerfed compared to their source material (comic)... and since cinematic universe is not cannon to the comic universe MEANS feats are not transferable!! ergo... comic Wally demolishes movie Clark. That is the ONLY logical outcome.
But if logic be damned...
good day
im not transfered comic feats to movie
im argue with superman I,II,III,IV and returns feats and give me his best feats please
Movies are nerfed compared to their source material (comic)... and since cinematic universe is not cannon to the comic universe MEANS feats are not transferable!! ergo... comic Wally demolishes movie Clark. That is the ONLY logical outcome.
But if logic be damned...
good day
im not transfered comic feats to movie
im argue with superman I,II,III,IV and returns feats and give me his best feats please
... if you are not transferring feats why are you producing comic scans of SA Superman (SA Superboy towing planets on the first page) as a counter to the comic Wally's feats? That, my friend is transference. And then you claimed they (comic and movie Superman) have the same feats, another instance of transference. You then posted to other viners a thesis on SA Superman further stacking your deck on transference.
I have said this to other viners I have debated when it comes to movie characters... if you took someone who knew nothing of Superman and made them watch Reeves/Routh Superman and then gave them to read comic Wally's feats... what would they say? Wally demolishes, no?
Movies are nerfed compared to their source material (comic)... and since cinematic universe is not cannon to the comic universe MEANS feats are not transferable!! ergo... comic Wally demolishes movie Clark. That is the ONLY logical outcome.
But if logic be damned...
good day
im not transfered comic feats to movie
im argue with superman I,II,III,IV and returns feats and give me his best feats please
... if you are not transferring feats why are you producing comic scans of SA Superman (SA Superboy towing planets on the first page) as a counter to the comic Wally's feats? That, my friend is transference. And then you claimed they (comic and movie Superman) have the same feats, another instance of transference. You then posted to other viners a thesis on SA Superman further stacking your deck on transference.
I have said this to other viners I have debated when it comes to movie characters... if you took someone who knew nothing of Superman and made them watch Reeves/Routh Superman and then gave them to read comic Wally's feats... what would they say? Wally demolishes, no?
Like I said... if logic be damned then...
good day
because i wanna to instruct them about who is actually SA Supes (Time Travel,Pushing Planets etc.)
even he can take him without comic feats
(Superman I,II,III,IV and Returns)
first of all he's truly invulnerable,a kryptonite continent couldn't hurt him,3 bloodlusted SA kryptonians(Zod,Non,Faora) couldn't beat him
and im sure about wally's fists can't do anything against him
because i wanna to instruct them about who is actually SA Supes (Time Travel,Pushing Planets etc.)
even he can take him without comic feats
(Superman I,II,III,IV and Returns)
first of all he's truly invulnerable,a kryptonite continent couldn't hurt him,3 bloodlusted SA kryptonians(Zod,Non,Faora) couldn't beat him
and im sure about wally's fists can't do anything against him
... but SA Superman is not Reeves/Routh Superman... R/R Superman is an adaptation of a superman based on on SA Superman. They are not the same being.
Let's take it further... SA Superman once towed planets... R/R Superman only pushed a moon... the question is can R/R Superman pull planets?... no! There is no evidence of that, only speculation because R/R Superman is an adaptation of SA Superman. Unfortunately mere speculation =/= fact!
Another way... Routh Superman got shanked by kryptonite, beat down, nearly drowned and then proceeded to pick up a kryptonite island and carried into space, this shows an insane level of resistance to his major weakness... SA Superman was notorious for being depowered by the words 'kryptonite'. I amplify to emphasize.
Again if you took someone who knew nothing of Superman and made them watch Reeves/Routh Superman and then gave them to read comic Wally's feats... what would they say? Wally demolishes, no? Especially of you add in the whole vibrate your molecules, speed steal, IMP etc etc...
Movies are nerfed compared to their source material (comic)... and since cinematic universe is not cannon to the comic universe MEANS feats are not transferable!! ergo... comic Wally demolishes movie Clark. That is the ONLY logical outcome.
But if logic be damned...
good day
im not transfered comic feats to movie
im argue with superman I,II,III,IV and returns feats and give me his best feats please
because i wanna to instruct them about who is actually SA Supes (Time Travel,Pushing Planets etc.)
even he can take him without comic feats
(Superman I,II,III,IV and Returns)
first of all he's truly invulnerable,a kryptonite continent couldn't hurt him,3 bloodlusted SA kryptonians(Zod,Non,Faora) couldn't beat him
and im sure about wally's fists can't do anything against him
... but SA Superman is not Reeves/Routh Superman... R/R Superman is an adaptation of a superman based on on SA Superman. They are not the same being.
Let's take it further... SA Superman once towed planets... R/R Superman only pushed a moon... the question is can R/R Superman pull planets?... no! There is no evidence of that, only speculation because R/R Superman is an adaptation of SA Superman. Unfortunately mere speculation =/= fact!
Another way... Routh Superman got shanked by kryptonite, beat down, nearly drowned and then proceeded to pick up a kryptonite island and carried into space, this shows an insane level of resistance to his major weakness... SA Superman was notorious for being depowered by the words 'kryptonite'. I amplify to emphasize.
Again if you took someone who knew nothing of Superman and made them watch Reeves/Routh Superman and then gave them to read comic Wally's feats... what would they say? Wally demolishes, no? Especially of you add in the whole vibrate your molecules, speed steal, IMP etc etc...
good day
thanks for the explanation
Reeve's Superman pushed the moon for very long distance while smiling (that means its pretty easy for him)
yes planet towing feat never shown on Movie Series even they don't give a reason for he should do but he's prove his strength level with Moon and Kryptonite Continent feats
Movies are nerfed compared to their source material (comic)... and since cinematic universe is not cannon to the comic universe MEANS feats are not transferable!! ergo... comic Wally demolishes movie Clark. That is the ONLY logical outcome.
But if logic be damned...
good day
im not transfered comic feats to movie
im argue with superman I,II,III,IV and returns feats and give me his best feats please
@dorukesin: So why did you make the thread? You're so confident Superman wins and Wally can't hurt him. Are you just trying to bait people into a fight?
@dorukesin: So why did you make the thread? You're so confident Superman wins and Wally can't hurt him. Are you just trying to bait people into a fight?
im just waiting for maybe some people will give me real Wally West feats and change the situations
Don’t make battles that are clearly one-sided. Most times this happens when people want to make one character look bad or another look good. Either way it’s childish and a waste of space. Sometimes it’s a mistake because you don’t know all the abilities of one of the characters and it turns out that they have a power that would make them win easily, but that doesn’t happen much (and it really shouldn’t, CV is an encyclopedia, look up characters before you make the fight). If it’s obvious you’re doing it on purpose, the thread will be locked.
Don’t make battles that are clearly one-sided. Most times this happens when people want to make one character look bad or another look good. Either way it’s childish and a waste of space. Sometimes it’s a mistake because you don’t know all the abilities of one of the characters and it turns out that they have a power that would make them win easily, but that doesn’t happen much (and it really shouldn’t, CV is an encyclopedia, look up characters before you make the fight). If it’s obvious you’re doing it on purpose, the thread will be locked.
exactly
i know every abilities and almost every single feat about Reeve's and Wally.Also Wally is my fav. character in comic universe.What about you ?
Don’t make battles that are clearly one-sided. Most times this happens when people want to make one character look bad or another look good. Either way it’s childish and a waste of space. Sometimes it’s a mistake because you don’t know all the abilities of one of the characters and it turns out that they have a power that would make them win easily, but that doesn’t happen much (and it really shouldn’t, CV is an encyclopedia, look up characters before you make the fight). If it’s obvious you’re doing it on purpose, the thread will be locked.
exactly
i know every abilities and almost every single feat about Reeve's and Wally.Also Wally is my fav. character in comic universe.What about you ?
Log in to comment