Batman (DCEU movie) vs Silver Surfer (Fox movie)

Reserving this spot, the moment Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice starts playing worldwide, I'll get the honour of being the first one to make this thread. Will bump it when necessary.

All I will say is that if Batman is really this powerful all hell is about to break loose this weekend on this forum

What the hell Is this even if batman does somehow beat Superman in BvS it's because of krpytonite and superman holding back and dceu superman isn't as powerful as fox silver surfer anyway so.

Batman wins with prep time.

No one beats him with prep.

@akshsarpanch: Spiderman could if they both got prep.

seems like a good fight based on the Batman v Superman trailers and what minor spoilers I heard.

will judge after i actually watched the movie

There is no way he is this powerful.

Yeah... this is what I was thinking.

I can't lock this, because I haven't seen the movie... but it feels like a mismatch to me.

This isn't fair dceu batman hasn't even been in a battle against mcu Captain America but he's in a battle against silver surfer.IMO silver surfer is still slightly more powerful than dceu Superman but with prep I can see batman standing a chance

Why is this being entertained?

Surfer beat who? Doctor Doom? That ain't planet busting.

Haven't seen the movie and already know this is a godstomp spite battle.

I don't even need to watch the film to know this is a mismatch.

lmao,Can't wait

*grabs popcorn*

That feat was very ambiguous. Galactus wasn't shown to be incapacitated, knocked out, or even hurt. That scene at best shows that Galactus was BFR-ed.

Just realized what OPs username is lol

Mismatch, Surfer Wins

Armored Batman's punch can't even make superman flinch

Unless he can make something with prep to contend with Surfer but I highly doubt it

Batman builds the device reed used or loses.

i think the main issue with him "beating Galactus" was that Movie Galactus had no durability feats. Destructive feats, arguably yes Galactus does have.

A good analogy is that a bomb can blow up an entire house, but it may not take much more than a hammer to damage and spoil the bomb. The destructive capability of a character does not imply a similar durability.

This is spite.

No. Silver Surfer from the Fox movie is around as powerful as DCEU Superman.

This is stupid.

Barring the prep, Silver Surfer.

Superman tore down a planet terraforming machine that exerts the gravity of Krypton on him. The fact that he can do it despite the gravity of Krypton bearing down on him is proof of his destructive capability.

What is proof of Silver Surfer's destructive capability? There are no durability feats on the cosmic space cloud. To know what is a character's destructive capability, you need to know the durability feats of the object that is being destroyed.

Also, who or what is Masker?

@namtab_god: Surfer could grab Batman fly him into the upper atmosphere and drop him. He has so many ways of winning

And Surfer can phase through anything Batman can throw at him. HE does not need durability.

It was bigger than a planet that alone shows destructive capabilities and ridiculous reach.

I wasn't actually talking about Silver Surfer's durability, just referring to Silver Surfer's destructive capability. It was said that Silver Surfer's destructive capability was planet level when I argued otherwise - the feat of Silver Surfer taking out a planet buster does not equate that Silver Surfer can planet bust.

And its rather ambiguous as to whether Silver Surfer could bust a planet, regular feats while he was on earth seemed to indicate nothing of that. I heard that the writers meant for Galactus to be BFRed, but I can't seem to find the source.

SS was so nerf'd in his movie. Having his power tied to his board was utterly stupid. Bruce would figure that out. I'm going to say Batman wins because of prep.... and out of protest for that terrible FF movie.

Oh and surfer wrecks mismatch

No, Batman can beat Surfer by knocking him out of the surfboard.

@namtab_god: How?

EDIT: Nvm I just saw your name..

Seems like spite.

By catching Silver Surfer off-guard and then building the tachyon pulse generator to separate him from the board. Reed Richards built that, so why not Batman with 1 year of prep.

@jedixman: it is a mismatch lock this

Mods please note carefully, its a prep battle, Silver Surfer has shown that he can be defeated with trickery and the right technology. If Batman have 1 year of prep, he COULD come up with the right technology to do it - He did show such feats based on what I hear from audiences as well as the trailers.

I'll need to see the movie myself to be fully clear, but that's my understanding as of now.

bump

Batman can do this.

If people thought MCU wank was bad....they have no idea what we're in for once this universe starts expanding. Can't wait for the "DCEU Batman vs Fox Apocalypse" thread to be made....

Silver Surfer wins. Resources in the movie does not automatically mean he can figure SS out, he is not as smart as Reed or Doom who didn't even need that long. Hell was he even smarter than plot induced Lex?

After watching BvS, I'm going to go with Batman. With a year of prep, Batman ends up stealing his surfboard. Among many other things.

Anyways, if I take off my logic, I could just say herp derp Batman ain't beaten SS with a billion years of prep. Cause 1 sec of prep by movie Reed is > 1 billion of bats.