Another age rant

#1 Posted by soduh2 (1048 posts) - - Show Bio

Am I the only one who thinks that Damian's death would have had a bigger impact if Dick wasn't 16 years old as Robin? In the new 52 Damian is apparently the youngest (so far) to take up the mantle, meaning his death (while tragic) shouldn't be a huge surprise. I think that if Dick would have started younger it would explain why Bruce (and especially Dick) would allow Damian to even take up the mantle in the first place. Otherwise, in line with the new 52, they should have waited a few years.

#2 Posted by Phaedrusgr (1701 posts) - - Show Bio

@soduh2: You're right, but...

#3 Posted by Z3RO180 (8373 posts) - - Show Bio

Uodljfdof ludlurxlurxbubrwowfu wfhbwoooygoyv ojbudbcywlhveocvekc isycvelch.

#4 Posted by Phaedrusgr (1701 posts) - - Show Bio

@Z3RO180: Isycvelch? Oh my, that's serious!

#5 Posted by ULTRAstarkiller (8573 posts) - - Show Bio

@soduh2: Ya your right having Dick 16 as Robin was the dumbest thing they did.

#6 Posted by SUNMAN (7544 posts) - - Show Bio

@soduh2: new 52 has only really hurt the Batfamily continuity wise

but we;ve known that for a while.

Damien's going to be replaced by someone else, which is pretty sad

#7 Posted by therrieur (261 posts) - - Show Bio

You're right but the weirdest thing in dick's timeline is that he still has been batman for a year

This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.